The ongoing conflict in Nasir highlights a broader concern that similar tensions could erupt in any state across South Sudan if the government does not take urgent and serious action. The situation in Nasir, where the White Army militias clashed with the South Sudan People’s Defense Forces (SSPDF), underscores the underlying risks of tribal divisions and political manipulation within the country. These dynamics must be addressed for South Sudan to have any hope of long-term stability.
I urge the Government of South Sudan to request international assistance for the disarmament process in all regions of the country. While disarming civilians, particularly in a country as divided along tribal lines as South Sudan, is not a simple task, it is necessary for the country’s peace and future. The government should partner with trusted international allies or nations with a strong track record in disarmament processes to help facilitate this process.
One of the primary causes of the violence in Nasir was the involvement of politicians in Juba, who supported the youth militias in Nasir for political gain. This led to a dangerous confrontation between the SSPDF and armed civilians. To prevent further bloodshed and fragmentation, it is crucial to disarm these militias, particularly those loyal to individuals or political factions.
South Sudan’s government alone cannot manage such a disarmament process effectively. Given the deep-rooted tribal loyalties and the complex political landscape, the international community’s assistance will be essential to avoid further escalation. The Government of South Sudan must make a formal request for international support, not only to ensure security but to help heal the divisions that fuel the violence.
However, the challenge remains significant. South Sudan’s tribal divisions complicate the process, and political interests make the task even more difficult. Disarmament, while necessary, will require a comprehensive strategy that involves community engagement, trust-building, and a clear commitment from all political factions. Without this, peace in South Sudan may remain elusive.
The disarmament process in South Sudan, facilitated by the international community, can mitigate the divisions among communities. However, conducting elections in the current situation is untenable, especially considering the proximity to 2026. I strongly advocate for the South Sudan government to seek assistance in disarmament efforts across all regional states.
The presence of tribal militias and the lack of trust between communities and the government can seriously undermine any efforts for peace or progress. Disarmament is not just about collecting weapons but also about building trust among the communities and ensuring that the process is impartial, transparent, and inclusive.
The South Sudan government must engage the international community for support, both in terms of logistical and financial resources, but also in terms of providing a neutral, unbiased presence to help ensure that the disarmament process is carried out fairly and effectively. Additionally, fostering dialogue with the local communities, addressing their concerns, and involving them in the process can help create an environment where trust can gradually be built, and the long-term stability of the country can be ensured.
Without such an effort, the risk of continued conflict and the failure to hold free and fair elections could remain high.
What steps do you think the international community can take to assist in this disarmament process?
The author can be contacted via dengdengt@yahoo.com.
The views expressed in ‘opinion’ articles published by Radio Tamazuj are solely those of the writer. The veracity of any claims made is the author’s responsibility, not Radio Tamazuj’s.